http://www.easternecho.com/content/palins-tolerance-not-real-rights-same-sex-unions
Palin's "tolerance" not real rights for same-sex unions
Opinions
By Brienne Willcock / Staff Writer
Monday, October 6, 2008
Tolerance. This is a word I kept hearing come out of Sarah Palin’s mouth in the vice presidential debate, and it echoes in my head.
I need a vice president and president that do more than just “tolerate” the people they represent. What about the idea of acceptance? Support? Or even, heaven forbid, empathy? The people in this country should never feel like they’re being tolerated. That’s not what we need.
We need to feel like our needs, wants and ideas about what makes this country worth living in are not only being heard, but really listened to.
Last week during the vice presidential debate, the moderator, Gwen Ifill, asked about the candidates views on gay marriage.
Immediately, my ears perked up. This is one of my “deal breakers” in an election.
Ifill asked Joe Biden and Sarah Palin, “Do you support (as they do in Alaska) granting same-sex benefits to couples?”
Biden immediately responded with: “Absolutely. Do I support granting same-sex benefits? Absolutely, positively. Look, in an Obama-Biden administration, there will be absolutely no distinction from a constitutional standpoint or a legal standpoint between a same-sex and a heterosexual couple.”
Thank god. Now this is what I needed to hear. He went on to explain some specifics: “We do support making sure that committed couples in a same-sex marriage are guaranteed the same constitutional benefits as it relates to their property rights, their rights of visitation, their rights to insurance, their rights of ownership as heterosexual couples have.”
Here’s a candidate that not only supports gay rights, but actually empathizes with same-sex couples, believing they should benefit from the same rights and privileges that he has as a heterosexual male. Twice, he brought up heterosexual couples. That, to me, is a way of validating that he acknowledges same-sex couples as being equals.
When Palin was asked the same question, would she support same-sex benefits being granted to couples, she responded, “Well, not if it goes closer and closer towards redefining the traditional definition of marriage between one man and one woman.”
“But I also want to clarify,” Palin continued. “If there's any kind of suggestion at all from my answer that I would be anything but tolerant of adults in America choosing their partners, choosing relationships that they deem best for themselves, you know, I am tolerant…”
Thanks for clarifying that you’re tolerant, and that you obviously think being gay is a choice. Am I impressed? Hardly. As I mentioned before, where’s the acceptance here? Is it too much to ask to have a candidate that recognizes differences (respectfully, by not using words like “choice”) and embraces them, instead of tolerating them?
She repeatedly said during the debate that the American people need someone that can be “straight” with them and that can address the needs they have. Oh, I believe her. I do think she’s saying exactly what she means, and that aspect is refreshing. I just don’t like what she’s saying.
Gee, wish I could look at a camera and tell people I “tolerate” them, without feeling badly about it. She sure can. Oh, and that she really doesn’t acknowledge them as being worthy of the same rights she has. Does she know how many gay men and women were sitting there staring back at her?
She does go on to say that in a McCain-Palin administration she wouldn’t prohibit the rights of same-sex couples. Ok, so she’s not going to take any of their rights away, but how many do they really have now?Neither candidate supports using the term “marriage,” though Biden obviously would not want to see any legal difference between a partnership that is heterosexual or homosexual. I disagree with him, and find it hypocritical that he won’t use the word marriage, but I understand that maybe the rights need to come first, the term can come later.
I need a candidate who is going to support, unconditionally, the civil rights of the people in this country. I don’t respect Palin’s approach to the subject at all. And the beautiful thing about her is that there’s no conflict. She isn’t being hypocritical at all. She’s not going to fight for the rights of same-sex couples (the rights that she benefits from as a heterosexual) or say she will, or redefine marriage – her stance, stays consistent.
Unfortunately, and much to my dismay, Biden’s isn’t as consistent or strong. However, he does more than “tolerate” the idea of same-sex couples receiving benefits, he actually supports it, and I respect that.